| |
The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- jack - SLÅSS? - Tue 20 Dec 02:42
|
|
Reply | It's becoming more and more common now for random little fucking cunts from Hungary etc etc to have a hacked PAM. Everyone knows what it is...you tag them 101039013 times and they never die.
Is there an easy way to prove a server has it?
95.156.230.45:28307 This server does for sure, can anyone prove it?
Thanks |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- Nik - POWERB. - Tue 20 Dec 12:46
|
|
Reply | sv_iwdnames
sv_iwds
/screenshot |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- jack - SLÅSS? - Tue 20 Dec 15:55
|
|
Reply | | yeah I got told that but I don't know what to look for. Password is asd123 if you could go have a look? |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- pUGGEEH - N||* - Tue 20 Dec 20:33
|
|
Reply | | May I ask what that's supposed to prove? As far as I know, the only way to prove that a modified PAM is being used is to create timestamps. |
|
|
Reply | yep, only timestamps.
i am sure that no one will have hackedPam.iwd on their server LoL
i think the best way to fight against hacked pam will be punkbuster update, scanning server files(main iwd file used) and report MD5 checksum to all players! if its not the same as it should be = modified!
just an idea... |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- Romeo - Romeo - Fri 30 Dec 02:19
|
|
Reply | this
pair up "sv_iwdnames" to "sv_iwds", check if z_srv_epam102 = 669768107, if so, the mod is legit |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- jack - SLÅSS? - Wed 21 Dec 11:48
|
|
Reply | | If you mean me, my accounts older than yours...hacked PAM hasn't been around long as far as I know. If you don't mean me, that's fine. |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- LayerS - LayerS - Thu 22 Dec 00:59
|
|
Reply | | fine, in the time I was around I sticked to one account and didnt need to change my GUID's once? |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- jack - SLÅSS? - Thu 22 Dec 02:32
|
|
Reply | kk make a new point cos your first one was invalid.
LOL
LOL
LOL |
|
|
Reply | jack this is old news.
hacked pam has been around for over half years now. |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- jack - SLÅSS? - Thu 22 Dec 20:54
|
|
Reply | | That's fine, we've (SLAASS) all had some time off cod2 for various reasons so we've only been playing again properly since about October. I just wanna know how to easily prove they have it...could ban so many people. |
|
|
Reply | Yes we are currently playing vs them and obviously they have pamhack. I'll ban them all soon. 
the funny thing is that we won these guys while they were pamhacking.
gg community. |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- tomY - COREPLAY - Wed 28 Dec 21:45
|
|
Reply | Yap.
And Jikser, i know you don't like me at all, but if you want, feel free to add me at my xfire. I've got plenty of their demos where they obviously used pamhack, so maybe we could work something out. They need to get banned  |
|
|
Reply | Nothing against you in person but your behauvior / attitude could change.
add me : hiltzi. |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- the ninja - Patria - Fri 6 Jan 12:37
|
|
Reply | Actually, tomY, they won't ''RAGE'' , u know why? Because they don't care. They took the pamhack and outhacked every ******* team in cb.(h3h3). I see no reason why u keep commenting on every our match in cb trying to convince the other team that they are pamhacking. Did we do sth that made u angry, or? Btw, citiram rockera, stvarno bi popusio sevi1zu da mozes, takav si da ne recem sto da skidas svaki demo di igraju i visis nad njima, aj ok nije moj problem al danas su na lanu, cujem da si ti bio na mnostvo lanova, dugu povijest imas , a? Aj budi tiho i nemoj mi se kurcit, tu se uvaljujes jikseru ko neki *** i ljubis mu guzicu misleci da ce igrat s tobom, mozda i hoce, ne znam.... What I'm trying to say is : tomY=ONLINER
Ne kazem da haxas, al jesi ONLINER
Btw, u dont feel like playing 1on1 matches in ur ladder, don't u?
http://clanbase.ggl.com/personinfo.php?pid=9059404&wars=1
http://clanbase.ggl.com/humaninfo.php?hid=3207183
http://clanbase.ggl.com/humaninfo.php?hid=3393541
http://clanbase.ggl.com/humaninfo.php?hid=3427436
de pogle skim si igro zadnja tri meca u 90 dana, i ti mi mislis bit RECORD HOLDER, btw EVERY RANK 1 that he got, he got it with either FORFEIT/REPORT AND REMOVED PREVIOUS GUY
xD
 |
|
|
Reply | | We are working on a permanent solution for this problem. |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- exzz - exzz - Fri 30 Dec 12:56
|
|
Reply | | ... |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- Avizura - tepel - Sun 8 Jan 23:05
|
|
Reply | Is possible to get banned because of having pamhack on the server with proof of /sv_iwds? Instead of making timestamps only? It seems that /sv_iwds does proof enough that there is a pamhack on the server.
http://clanbase.ggl.com/warinfo.php?wid=11220897
Any C&A admin reply if you could.
http://clanbase.ggl.com/personinfo.php?pid=3373691
Told us you could see if the opponent is using pamhack by entering the command /sv_iwds and check for z_srv_epam102 = 669768107
When it's not, it should be seen as hacked pam, right.?
So if this method is proven to work, why not add it as a rule to have a compact list of maps and the epam mod with the sv_iwds numbers and all servers should stick to those, using other mods on the server would lead to a forfeit? |
| |
RE:The new enemy of cod2: HACKED PAM
- Niek - itz - Thu 12 Jan 20:39
|
|
Reply | is it allowed to typ /openscriptmenu asd cola or /openscriptmenu asd hide if you think the opponents server has hacked pam?
i do this when i think the server has hacked pam, and sometimes I hit after i typed that very much. | << Back to Topic List
| |