In a close fight, sÐ showed to have just a little more strength then iNz. First level: Ranel-JEsÐ had some members problems, as one of their main players,
muEtzE, broke his fingers the day before the war.
UrsTheBear showed up in time to replace him, and the game could get going. Server was quickly agreed on, and without any problems we could start the first map.
Very early into the game, it became obvious that both sides had a stronger defense then offense, and for 8 minutes long, neither side managed to get the flag out of their opponents base.
UrsTheBear and
scream didn't look to have alot of teamplay together, and the great defense by
iNz*GølÐ.« and
sh1ty.« didn't let much slip.
Untill there were 10 minutes remaining, then
UrsTheBear picked up the enemy flag, and made a quick run towards low midfield, and managed to reach his own base with some nice backup, only to be stopped by
iNz*GølÐ.« and
iNz*Mediçus, who managed to return the flag.
About 5 minutes after that, when I started to believe this map would end in 0-0,
scream stood up to prove me wrong. He grabbed the flag, found some backup and made a quick run through lower midfield.
iNz was unable to break through the
sÐ defense, and
scream scored the 1-0, which would also be the end score for this map, even though
iNz*KOSTAKi was mighty close to opening the score in a standoff before this run.
Screenshots:
sÐ 
win by 1 to 0Second level: AreaN23-LE103Second map was AreaN, and
iNz decided to put up an offensive tactic here, with 2 defenders playing very close to midfield, one mid helping out in attack often, and 2 fulltime attackers.
sÐ on the other hand decided to go a bit more defensive, and move the game to midfield whenever their attackers made it that far. In the meantime PSV scored the 1-0 against AC Milan, making me excited, and
iNz*cR4zY-n^ upset, for he was losing some money.
Again the game started out slowly, with no strong attacks made within the first 10 minutes. Especially
iNz*Chrusaor and
sting were doing a great job in defense.
iNz wasn't satisfied with a draw here, and moved more and more towards attacking. Soon they switched to a 2-0-3 tactic, and even though they got some good chances, it was
sÐ who took advantage of this change of tactic. Two well-played attacks within the last 8 minutes, with a fully controlled midfield, led to two caps, which was just a bit too much for
iNz to catch up with in time.
Screenshots:
sÐ win by 2 to 0Third level: Cynosure][Both sides weren't too keen on attacking hard this map, probably because of a lack of experience playing this map. Just like the other maps,
iNz attacked very hard, with
iNz*cR4zY-n^ picking up alot of flags. But just like the other maps, the
sÐ defense was just too strong for them to actually finish a cap.
The fact that
sÐ only needed a draw in this map to win the game showed pretty well, as they never let their opponent get farther then midfield. They made some strong attacks, but their priority was always on the defense.
Neither side managed to make an attack to open the score, and after 20 minutes the score was still 0-0, giving
sÐ the victory tonight.
Screenshots:
draw 0 - 0Conclusion
sÐ showed to have one of the best defenses in the cup, not letting
iNz cap even once. If they manage to get their strongest lineup back in time, they make sure to give oG one hell of a fight in the final.
max (-[oG][-  ) 10 May 2005 12:16 | Reply |
|
| |J&F|bunneh (|J&F|) 10 May 2005 11:02 | Reply |
ROFL KEV CANT PLAY THE FINAL! :PpPPPpPp |
| f4k3 (Lw) 10 May 2005 09:20 | Reply |
i havn't watched demos \ utv
but as far as i remember playing in il pu's, or vs il clans, we usully play 3d 2a 
only on spiecal maps we do 2d 1m 2a ;p
and i dont think its brutswart(or however i spell it)
but thats just my pov |
| abeo ([fp.] ) 9 May 2005 16:50 | Reply |
Very mostly cleverestiest |
| iNz*cR4zY-n^ (iNz* ) 9 May 2005 14:45 | Reply |
cR4everest :< |
EViLRiDER ([*P*]  ) 9 May 2005 14:12 | Reply |
STFU everyone, the cF4verest is giving in. |
| Avlan (*UT*) 9 May 2005 13:12 | Reply |
duran wrote:
h0shi wrote:
well, i call it a good defense, if there are 2 players, that can handle it alone.
If you need 3 defs and 2 returning attackers on every flagpickup i wouldn't call it "impressive". It's just good old bratwurst.
as if looza / 23 never go on retrieval when a flag is missing 
lzR going for the points? Never!!! |
| iNz*cR4zY-n^ (iNz* ) 9 May 2005 12:33 | Reply |
More cleverer. |
| pyroplexus ([H&P] ) 9 May 2005 02:01 | Reply |
iNz*cR4zY-n^ wrote:
Cleverer is corret term I think, as long as word doesn't have more then 6 letters it can be used with a "er" at end and "est" if you're using superlative. If it's morethen 6 letters then you use "more". Well, I think it's that, but maybe some uk guy could make us more smart!? :x
It's to do with syllables I think, three or more syllables just sounds messy with an 'er' on the end, as it adds on yet another one.
However, some words like the example here 'clever' can have an 'er' added onto the end, but it sounds clumbsy because you have a double 'er'. I don't think there's a particular rule for this, just that 'more clever' sounds better than 'cleverer' although 'cleverest' and 'most clever' are both equally fine.
Typical English though to be fair, it's governed by very few rules, and there are so many exceptions it's a waste of time even bothering to learn them. It's all you Saxons, Vikings and Normans invading us and bollocksing up our language that are to blame. Bastards. |
{DnF}3d` aka 10fd4g1r|z ({DnF}  ) 8 May 2005 17:35 | Reply |
It's a bit harsh to criticise sD for playing defensively imo. Winning a EC 1/2 Final in 3 maps and conceding 0 caps is the ideal result I would've thought. Yes they'll lose to oG in the final, but so would any of the other more "attacking" clans ;>
Btw, you can say the cleverer or the cleverest give in. Not that the phrase on its own really communicates any kind of great logic that provides an alternative way of looking at this situation...but still >_< |
| iNz*cR4zY-n^ (iNz* ) 8 May 2005 15:54 | Reply |
rAzA wrote:
SoLiD wrote:
rAzA wrote:
Someone has to win. And if u follow the phrase "Der Klügere gibt nach!" in english i believe its "The cleverer give in", iNz are the smarter peeps :>.
you mean more clever?
no, it sounds funny, but as google told me, this has to be the correct translation, dunno why
Cleverer is corret term I think, as long as word doesn't have more then 6 letters it can be used with a "er" at end and "est" if you're using superlative. If it's morethen 6 letters then you use "more". Well, I think it's that, but maybe some uk guy could make us more smart!? :x |
| rAzA (-=I$F=- ) 8 May 2005 14:12 | Reply |
SoLiD wrote:
rAzA wrote:
Someone has to win. And if u follow the phrase "Der Klügere gibt nach!" in english i believe its "The cleverer give in", iNz are the smarter peeps :>.
you mean more clever?
no, it sounds funny, but as google told me, this has to be the correct translation, dunno why |
| SoLiD (LT ) 8 May 2005 12:12 | Reply |
rAzA wrote:
Someone has to win. And if u follow the phrase "Der Klügere gibt nach!" in english i believe its "The cleverer give in", iNz are the smarter peeps :>.
you mean more clever? |
| Qk@c (*f) 8 May 2005 09:52 | Reply |
muEtzE` wrote:
we`ll try our best
best resources? :F |
| [.Levi*257.] ([.Levi.] ) 8 May 2005 07:56 | Reply |
MaNsOn wrote:
Please name me 2 players that can handle all enemies attacks during all map on their own without help
I know them, but i wont tell you!!!111 |
| snakez^ aka sZ (-[FV]-) 8 May 2005 03:18 | Reply |
what if some1 turned around and claimed ''loading rockets is gay, its a lame tactic to get the frag, USE instant rockets or your a lam0r !''
the same thing is happening here dnot u think?
''dont be defencive its lame! play offensive you lam0rs!'' :E
tactics arn't illegal, and they're not lame, they're just differnet :E
look at it this way: if they got 4 defending at one point of the map, they got one attacking :P |
| muEtzE` (sÐ ) 7 May 2005 23:12 | Reply |
we`ll try our best |
| KaYoZ (-[oG][- ) 7 May 2005 19:44 | Reply |
sting wrote:
...oG are just humans too 
thats true!!!
i think it would be a very exciting match
/me is looking forward to face sD!
btw. i think the final is on Thursday |
| x2.Chrusaor (x2 ) 7 May 2005 14:34 | Reply |
muEtzE` wrote:
nobody expected us to reach finals and i think noone wants us to be in finals, thats why , right :P?
i rather reached the finals myself tbh :F |
| badt vel megoza (`u) 7 May 2005 13:18 | Reply |
gg both.
Expected. |
| iNz*cR4zY-n^ (iNz* ) 7 May 2005 12:32 | Reply |
muEtzE` wrote:
nobody expected us to reach finals and i think noone wants us to be in finals, thats why , right :P?
Yes. |
| muEtzE` (sÐ ) 7 May 2005 10:48 | Reply |
nobody expected us to reach finals and i think noone wants us to be in finals, thats why , right :P? |
| EViLRiDER ([*P*] ) 7 May 2005 10:44 | Reply |
Ginga_Ninja wrote:
My PC died so I had to build a new one, still installing more essential stuff so IRC will have to come a bit later.
You however still find the time to spam random flames on CB. How very unginger of you ;_; |
| Duke (*UT*) 7 May 2005 10:09 | Reply |
UrsTheBear wrote:
do i have to apologize for not being a runner like jojo or lzR?
sry we try our best with the ressources we have.
I think it speaks in sD's favour that they wanted to play this game no matter what their team, even with 2 main players missing.
So what if oG are the favourites, you can't blame sD for that.
Only ones here that could blame sD for their tactics are iNz, but they don't. And I don't understand why so many people have to make a problem out of it. |
| Ginga_Ninja (UK) 7 May 2005 10:01 | Reply |
EViLRiDER wrote:
Ginga, better join IRC instead of this lame flaming, I gotta show you smth
My PC died so I had to build a new one, still installing more essential stuff so IRC will have to come a bit later. |
| MaNsOn (|NFK| ) 7 May 2005 09:47 | Reply |
h0shi wrote:
MaNsOn wrote:
h0shi wrote:
well, i call it a good defense, if there are 2 players, that can handle it alone.
If you need 3 defs and 2 returning attackers on every flagpickup i wouldn't call it "impressive". It's just good old bratwurst.
Please name me 2 players that can handle all enemies attacks during all map on their own without help
if the attack puts enough pressure on the enemy defense, they won't be able to attack too hard.
Anyway, it's something different, to have your teammates help out in critical situations, than having 3 fulltime defenders with 2 attackers shifting to reversegear when the enemy takes the flag.
So, a good defense in my eyes is, if 2 players can handle the enemy attacks MOST of the time on their own. better?
yeah much better ! <img src='http://games.clanbase.com/smiley5.gif' border='0' width='16' height='16' align=absbottom> |
| EViLRiDER ([*P*] ) 7 May 2005 09:33 | Reply |
Ginga, better join IRC instead of this lame flaming, I gotta show you smth |
| sting (sÐ ) 7 May 2005 07:36 | Reply |
yeh..
and what do we know at the end? sD are newbs, oG are gods..
lmao @ discussion what defense and offense is better or worse
we'll try to give oG a hard fight and maybe the noname newbs called sD can surprise on some maps because the allmighty heroes of oG are just humans too |
| Ginga_Ninja (UK) 7 May 2005 03:01 | Reply |
UrsTheBear wrote:
do i have to apologize for not being a runner like jojo or lzR?
sry we try our best with the ressources we have.
I could make a comment about muetze and resources here, but I wouldn't sink so low. <img src='http://games.clanbase.com/smiley4.gif' border='0' width='16' height='16' align=absbottom> |
| od (UK) 7 May 2005 02:50 | Reply |
idd if sD's defense can hold vulc+lzr with 23 on mid i'd be surprised, and if their off can beat kayoz+azyd i'd ALSO be surprised....
/me predicts 5-0's :<<< |
| duran (LT ) 7 May 2005 02:22 | Reply |
h0shi wrote:
well, i call it a good defense, if there are 2 players, that can handle it alone.
If you need 3 defs and 2 returning attackers on every flagpickup i wouldn't call it "impressive". It's just good old bratwurst.
as if looza / 23 never go on retrieval when a flag is missing |
| UrsTheBear (sÐ ) 7 May 2005 01:46 | Reply |
do i have to apologize for not being a runner like jojo or lzR?
sry we try our best with the ressources we have. |
| h0shi (-[oG][- ) 6 May 2005 22:54 | Reply |
MaNsOn wrote:
h0shi wrote:
well, i call it a good defense, if there are 2 players, that can handle it alone.
If you need 3 defs and 2 returning attackers on every flagpickup i wouldn't call it "impressive". It's just good old bratwurst.
Please name me 2 players that can handle all enemies attacks during all map on their own without help
if the attack puts enough pressure on the enemy defense, they won't be able to attack too hard.
Anyway, it's something different, to have your teammates help out in critical situations, than having 3 fulltime defenders with 2 attackers shifting to reversegear when the enemy takes the flag.
So, a good defense in my eyes is, if 2 players can handle the enemy attacks MOST of the time on their own. better? |
| Ginga_Ninja (UK) 6 May 2005 21:43 | Reply |
sith wrote:
liverpool is using the same tactic.. and they are in the final too now..
dont see the problem
Liverpool have good attackers.... |
| KaYoZ (-[oG][- ) 6 May 2005 20:57 | Reply |
devereux - azyd!!! |
| Siri ([k]) 6 May 2005 20:52 | Reply |
Hackie.nl wrote:
sÐ had some members problems, as one of their main players, muEtzE, broke his fingers the day before the war.
I thought he didn't need his fingers to aim  .
xDDD
gl in final sD =) |
| MaNsOn (|NFK| ) 6 May 2005 19:28 | Reply |
h0shi wrote:
well, i call it a good defense, if there are 2 players, that can handle it alone.
If you need 3 defs and 2 returning attackers on every flagpickup i wouldn't call it "impressive". It's just good old bratwurst.
Please name me 2 players that can handle all enemies attacks during all map on their own without help |
| cAze! (.vNe\) 6 May 2005 19:27 | Reply |
Congratz to next EC, oG][ |
| Rayden (-][FIG][- ) 6 May 2005 18:19 | Reply |
sith wrote:
liverpool is using the same tactic.. and they are in the final too now..
dont see the problem
yeah and the liverpool players also plays for free. |
| sith (sÐ ) 6 May 2005 17:15 | Reply |
liverpool is using the same tactic.. and they are in the final too now..
dont see the problem <img src='http://games.clanbase.com/smiley5.gif' border='0' width='16' height='16' align=absbottom> |
| rAzA (-=I$F=- ) 6 May 2005 17:12 | Reply |
Someone has to win. And if u follow the phrase "Der Klügere gibt nach!" in english i believe its "The cleverer give in", iNz are the smarter peeps :>. |
| sting (sÐ ) 6 May 2005 15:37 | Reply |
h0shi wrote:
well, i call it a good defense, if there are 2 players, that can handle it alone.
If you need 3 defs and 2 returning attackers on every flagpickup i wouldn't call it "impressive". It's just good old bratwurst.
i would call it smart, nothing else
the win showed it was the right tactic in this match |
| sith (sÐ ) 6 May 2005 14:15 | Reply |
thx m8 <img src='http://games.clanbase.com/smiley1.gif' border='0' width='16' height='16' align=absbottom> |
| KaYoZ (-[oG][- ) 6 May 2005 13:32 | Reply |
gg, espeacially sith! |
| h0shi (-[oG][- ) 6 May 2005 12:38 | Reply |
well, i call it a good defense, if there are 2 players, that can handle it alone.
If you need 3 defs and 2 returning attackers on every flagpickup i wouldn't call it "impressive". It's just good old bratwurst. |
| iNz*cR4zY-n^ (iNz* ) 6 May 2005 12:31 | Reply |
You can't win a Championship if you don't win game.
But if artificial fella wins it for you, it makes sense. |
| azad^ (fd`) 6 May 2005 12:30 | Reply |
oG has the best def+off so it seems to be a very interesting game ;P
go azyd^! ;o |
| sting (sÐ ) 6 May 2005 11:56 | Reply |
Axey wrote:
Interesting final
Offensive Gaming vs Defensive Gaming
Offense wins Games, Defense wins Championships
gg inz
maniii wrote:
sting rox
wow is skill practise  |
| maniii (LT ) 6 May 2005 10:25 | Reply |
sting rox |
| muEtzE` (sÐ ) 6 May 2005 09:50 | Reply |
lock` wrote:
:P probaly gonne be a walk in the park for oG here :P i doubt sD has the defensive ability to keep 23 + vulc + lzr out of the base as fragass, their main defender, had trouble with hackie + bunneh :E
yes of course we will lose very high coz we suck m8 gggggg |
| lock` (sku) 6 May 2005 02:27 | Reply |
:P probaly gonne be a walk in the park for oG here :P i doubt sD has the defensive ability to keep 23 + vulc + lzr out of the base as fragass, their main defender, had trouble with hackie + bunneh :E |
| iNz*cR4zY-n^ (iNz* ) 5 May 2005 21:23 | Reply |
muEtzE` wrote:
~de.øwNeR~ wrote:
TJA, WIN GEHT WOHL NUR MIT DE cF4 =PPPPP
gg guys
rofl
PS:
cR4
PSS:
(22:40:29) (de|SouL) rofl cheating does not ONLY make smaller dicks but also brains? :P
MORD. |
| iNz*cR4zY-n^ (iNz* ) 5 May 2005 21:20 | Reply |
GGs sD, nice match, thx UTV. Server unfortunately reminded me of ISDN days. :/ |
| iNz*KOSTAKi (iNz* ) 5 May 2005 16:39 | Reply |
gg sD
we are looking for a good mid player or a very good defender. please mail me kostaki@inzane.de |
| muEtzE` (sÐ ) 5 May 2005 16:32 | Reply |
~de.øwNeR~ wrote:
TJA, WIN GEHT WOHL NUR MIT DE cF4 =PPPPP
gg guys
rofl |
| ~de.øwNeR~ (~de.~ ) 5 May 2005 14:24 | Reply |
TJA, WIN GEHT WOHL NUR MIT DE cF4 =PPPPP
gg guys |
| ~de.m/s$aKa~ (~de.~ ) 5 May 2005 14:21 | Reply |
hrhr gg cF4 :P DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD |
| Belemil ([fp.] ) 5 May 2005 13:49 | Reply |
Axey wrote:
Interesting final
Offensive Gaming vs Defensive Gaming
bulls eye |
| [.Levi*257.] ([.Levi.] ) 5 May 2005 13:34 | Reply |
gg |
| Qk@c (*f) 5 May 2005 13:03 | Reply |
Hackie.nl wrote:
sÐ had some members problems, as one of their main players, muEtzE, broke his fingers the day before the war.
I thought he didn't need his fingers to aim .
ROFL OWNED |
| Qk@c (*f) 5 May 2005 13:02 | Reply |
Axey wrote:
Interesting final
Offensive Gaming vs Defensive Gaming
or 5 att vs 5 def :F |
| Hackie.nl (NL) 5 May 2005 13:00 | Reply |
sÐ had some members problems, as one of their main players, muEtzE, broke his fingers the day before the war.
I thought he didn't need his fingers to aim <img src='http://games.clanbase.com/smiley2.gif' border='0' width='16' height='16' align=absbottom> <img src='http://games.clanbase.com/smiley6.gif' border='0' width='16' height='16' align=absbottom>. |
| muEtzE` (sÐ ) 5 May 2005 12:59 | Reply |
.ez'genai. wrote:
rofl... that must be some retarted shit if you are not joking...
i guess sith`s comment achieved his aim :P |
| .ez'genai. (.ez' ) 5 May 2005 12:32 | Reply |
sith wrote:
gg iNz
and at all whiners..
YES, we play defensiv but WE are in the final not u hahaha :P
rofl... that must be some retarted shit if you are not joking... |
| mYthos.o2 (o2 ) 5 May 2005 12:25 | Reply |
Axey wrote:
Interesting final
Offensive Gaming vs Defensive Gaming
haha idd |
| ~P1mP^~ (-<TCF>-) 5 May 2005 12:12 | Reply |
gg's , i hope sD can do some damage vs oG! i was pretty surprised that iNz reached the semi-finals... but well done iNz anyways!
breaking your finger before a semi-final eurocup ^^ |
| sith (sÐ ) 5 May 2005 11:37 | Reply |
if mütze is back i can attack vs hans ! |
| x2.Chrusaor (x2 ) 5 May 2005 11:34 | Reply |
we had 1 great chance on cyno, but unfortunaly sith gave me a a snipeshot so i only had like 33 health after crazy got killed and lost the flag. at the same time sith killed cra he got a spree so i didnt notice at first, took to long to grab the flag couldnt make the ih jump anymore and the only chance we got on that map was lost.
wp sD and gl vs oG if u keep ur def tight we can expect a close 5 mapper of 0-0 all the way :f coz kay + azyd > scream + urs |
| Axey (MPD) 5 May 2005 11:34 | Reply |
Interesting final
Offensive Gaming vs Defensive Gaming |
| muEtzE` (sÐ ) 5 May 2005 11:24 | Reply |
gg |
| duran (LT ) 5 May 2005 11:17 | Reply |
Great job my germans
...but 1-0 on Ranel wtf! |
| sith (sÐ ) 5 May 2005 11:03 | Reply |
gg iNz
and at all whiners..
YES, we play defensiv but WE are in the final not u hahaha :P |
| EViLRiDER ([*P*] ) 5 May 2005 10:45 | Reply |
gg both
wp sD, please start practicing again before the final and let us have an open and exciting game :E |
Войти
