hIphOp wrote:
3. It's time to settle with the outcome mr sith, i don't hear Lords whine after they had to replay a match within two days where they couldn't field Vulc. They accepted it like men, i suggest you do too.

`Jin^ wrote:
I think they should be made to play ctf-andaction redeemer arena ff100%

Whoever loses has to pay for UT ffa/pug servers for the community.

Z@cob wrote:
i r teh sux!!

Z@cob wrote:
whaever

{DnF}3d` aka 10fd4g1r|z wrote:
Take a footy analogy. If there's an accidental handball on the goalline, and this clearly prevented a goal, then a penalty will still be given even though the player won't be punished. If it was intentional he'll get sent off as well.

sith wrote:
@ clanbase, if u would be faster in your decision we could play with our 'normal' team, now we have to improvise, nice to give us a second punishmend gogo want a third one!

Z@cob wrote:
equal treatment inst true, would u ever look into 10 demo's from the players if this was a 3rd div cw? never, boost would go unpunished for sure.

imo if boost gave clear advantage then just forfeit sD and thats it, even if its unintentional, they had advantage of it, end of story. If you're counting the boost as not giving advantage then dont default sD, imho the situation is this. Doing a rematch is telling everyone CB doesnt have enough courage to punish or prize. Its the same as making no decision. We dont need you for that.

Well just MAKE A DECISION not a semi-something like this is imho and not trying to be ofensive

Nijntje wrote:
sith wrote:
errr?
that means the team played vs inz, would also NOT play in the playoffs, where is the problem?

sith wrote:


@ clanbase, if u would be faster in your decision we could play with our 'normal' team, now we have to improvise, nice to give us a second punishmend gogo want a third one!

sith wrote:
@ clanbase, if u would be faster in your decision we could play with our 'normal' team, now we have to improvise, nice to give us a second punishmend gogo want a third one!

WonderBRA wrote:
Tiensin wrote:
"Since the flagcarrier got shot from the direction he wanted to go, and he did not time the boost by stopping in his flagrun and the unlikelyness to come up the idea to boost with a slow secondary shockball we believe the boost is unintentional."


Welcome to clanbase.
sD didn't deserve this imo. It was somethin that happens verry often..u just can't take your own members into account while fightin in an area like the mid of arean.
Soz, but im also mainly the one who gives the covers, and should i be now afraid to actually shoot someone near our fc?


I tell you what would be interesting, playing ctf with friendly fire disabled! now that would seperate the men from the boys!!! <img src='http://games.clanbase.com/smiley5.gif' border='0' width='16' height='16' align=absbottom>

Belemil wrote:
Weird decission considering all kinds of unintentional boosts that are made.
Think its just couse it was an important game that this decission was made, which is abit stupid tbh :|
But I think sD win anyway so...

sith wrote:
@ crazy, blalalall blablalbabla o_Ô


fact is, u! (not all of inz), disavow that inz is unable to reach playoffs the normal way, und u try it in such a way now, nice!


@ clanbase, if u would be faster in your decision we could play with our 'normal' team, now we have to improvise, nice to give us a second punishmend gogo want a third one!

(01:14:57) (HumaK) there's a guy called poolman...isn't he ita?

od wrote:
This is totally a 50/50 case, i think both sides of the arguement have valid points ::{

muetze wrote:
~de.cR4zY-n^~ wrote:
PS: when muetze dropped from revenge their flag was already in our base in front of capping. And on second drop it wasn't even taken as far as I rememeber. So I don't quite get the thing about us not being able to cap single flag if he didn't drop. Oh well I guess it's ONE MORE "we're sD, resistance is futile, you will be assimilated" sentence.

NO IT WASNT , and btw turn off your fucking sd`resistance shit thx nap

and it´s still not a boost , just learn it. name it however you want BUt it´s not a boost.

and kepa what about : shut up? btw it´s still me > you

[.Levi*257.] wrote:
blablabla.

[.Levi*257.] wrote:
Wrong interpretation of the rules, there is rule about "getting an advantage".

You got just two possibilities:

1. That was a boost - so sd gets a default loss, perhaps the player gets a bann.

2. No boost - nothing happens.

If you make decisions of "getting an advantage", then all clans, that had a player disconnecting during the game should get a replay of the match.

"- sub 8. Launching your teammate, yourself or the flag in any way is not allowed, with exception of methods mentioned below."

First of all there is no rule about "boost", it says launching and launching always is wanted.

"- sub 11 If a player gets caught braking one of the above rules, his clan recieves a penalty based on the situation."

This rules wasnt broken so, why to mention this rules now?!

"he did not time the boost by stopping in his flagrun and the unlikelyness to come up the idea to boost with a slow secondary shockball"

So there is no -launching-, if you really say this, you cannot make any decisions.

-> conclusion as i said before: bann sith and give inz a win or do nothing, there is no rule for that what you are doing right now.

-> just for the guys saying i might be on any side: i did NOT see the demo, the avi or sth like that, so i really do not how it was, i am just saying sth about the news post and the decision.

Tiensin wrote:
"Since the flagcarrier got shot from the direction he wanted to go, and he did not time the boost by stopping in his flagrun and the unlikelyness to come up the idea to boost with a slow secondary shockball we believe the boost is unintentional."


Welcome to clanbase.
sD didn't deserve this imo. It was somethin that happens verry often..u just can't take your own members into account while fightin in an area like the mid of arean.
Soz, but im also mainly the one who gives the covers, and should i be now afraid to actually shoot someone near our fc?

~de.cR4zY-n^~ wrote:
PS: when muetze dropped from revenge their flag was already in our base in front of capping. And on second drop it wasn't even taken as far as I rememeber. So I don't quite get the thing about us not being able to cap single flag if he didn't drop. Oh well I guess it's ONE MORE "we're sD, resistance is futile, you will be assimilated" sentence.

muetze wrote:
ridiculous..
btw i want replay of revenge coz i dropped from serv and inz capped! they got advantage out of it otherwise they never would have capped one single flag

sith wrote:
i also stop covering cause i wont boost fraggass in this situation, that this one shockball hit him is bad luck.
and that gold would hit him is just bullshit.. if i didnt stop covering gold could respawn as every other player from inz it does the whole evening ...

in the words of phero, " this is going too far " ...

My thanks to Lilly and others that made decission which looks pretty fair imo.

BTW:
Why people talk about fairness, but then talk lies about boost and that I should get ban etc and that I noosted itendionaly, just because they hate me, de, few of other de or just don't have better hobby in life, but listening to others and hating some1 without a real reason.

However, GG fx in advance 'cos I can smell heavy brat-game and kicking de's azZz. ^^

Wp orso. :P