katz wrote:
kOTTEN wrote:
katz wrote:
kOTTEN wrote:
You still dont get it do you kazik, lol.
As I've said I had no other option but to use a facknicker.
And I do have recieved support for our performance this year, both from swedes and others. And ye keep saying im a bad captain, but in that case you could tell briandj and devil and most of the other countries that they're bad captains as well.

16-12

1-0Blonde - Ginger

Also I find it amusing that rules arent the same for everyone, brian said that he'd talked with higher admins about his situation with snippy since they were brothers, and that was okey? What if isak and riseagainst are brothers ?


1-0

im not ginger

2-0

kOTTEN wrote:
katz wrote:
kOTTEN wrote:
You still dont get it do you kazik, lol.
As I've said I had no other option but to use a facknicker.
And I do have recieved support for our performance this year, both from swedes and others. And ye keep saying im a bad captain, but in that case you could tell briandj and devil and most of the other countries that they're bad captains as well.

16-12

1-0Blonde - Ginger

Also I find it amusing that rules arent the same for everyone, brian said that he'd talked with higher admins about his situation with snippy since they were brothers, and that was okey? What if isak and riseagainst are brothers ?

kOTTEN wrote:
katz wrote:
kOTTEN wrote:
You still dont get it do you kazik, lol.
As I've said I had no other option but to use a facknicker.
And I do have recieved support for our performance this year, both from swedes and others. And ye keep saying im a bad captain, but in that case you could tell briandj and devil and most of the other countries that they're bad captains as well.

16-12

1-0Blonde - Ginger

Also I find it amusing that rules arent the same for everyone, brian said that he'd talked with higher admins about his situation with snippy since they were brothers, and that was okey? What if isak and riseagainst are brothers ?

Go Go Go! wrote:
-mQ! BrianDJ- wrote:
kzk wrote:
nirvana wrote:
kzk wrote:
Still it doesn't change my point, your accounts could get linked by dmw as they did to isak and your nation would be punished as well
-say hay to mocha-

They cant, because it's common knowledge they are brothers
?? isak could of claim that guy was his bro too ?
btw. brian, not my fault other nations are getting punished for something u don't

My nation can't be punished cause i already asked if he was allowed to play before the first nc war. Admins said after they discussed it with all cb admins that it was allowed to let snippy's brother play. Spam their cb message box, use the forums or mail them, cause we already know your point of view about this now.

anyway crack = snippy ur not better as a captain. bit sad since NL got more player then SWEDEN? and more high skilled player.

Go Go Go!

-mQ! BrianDJ- wrote:
kzk wrote:
nirvana wrote:
kzk wrote:
Still it doesn't change my point, your accounts could get linked by dmw as they did to isak and your nation would be punished as well
-say hay to mocha-

They cant, because it's common knowledge they are brothers
?? isak could of claim that guy was his bro too ?
btw. brian, not my fault other nations are getting punished for something u don't

My nation can't be punished cause i already asked if he was allowed to play before the first nc war. Admins said after they discussed it with all cb admins that it was allowed to let snippy's brother play. Spam their cb message box, use the forums or mail them, cause we already know your point of view about this now.

katz wrote:
kOTTEN wrote:
You still dont get it do you kazik, lol.
As I've said I had no other option but to use a facknicker.
And I do have recieved support for our performance this year, both from swedes and others. And ye keep saying im a bad captain, but in that case you could tell briandj and devil and most of the other countries that they're bad captains as well.

16-12

1-0

kOTTEN wrote:
You still dont get it do you kazik, lol.
As I've said I had no other option but to use a facknicker.
And I do have recieved support for our performance this year, both from swedes and others. And ye keep saying im a bad captain, but in that case you could tell briandj and devil and most of the other countries that they're bad captains as well.

16-12

G0Ri wrote:
Haha what a shit cup !

forfeit forfeit forfeit ftw !

G0Ri wrote:
Haha what a shit cup !

forfeit forfeit forfeit ftw !

kzk wrote:
nirvana wrote:
kzk wrote:
Still it doesn't change my point, your accounts could get linked by dmw as they did to isak and your nation would be punished as well
-say hay to mocha-

They cant, because it's common knowledge they are brothers
?? isak could of claim that guy was his bro too ?
btw. brian, not my fault other nations are getting punished for something u don't

kOTTEN wrote:
You still dont get it do you kazik, lol.
As I've said I had no other option but to use a facknicker.
And I do have recieved support for our performance this year, both from swedes and others. And ye keep saying im a bad captain, but in that case you could tell briandj and devil and most of the other countries that they're bad captains as well.

16-12

kzk wrote:
kOTTEN wrote:
kaparzo and illusion. Keep saying what ever you want, you can even call me a shit captain, I dont mind since I rarely play this game anymore. Besides I've received support from most of the community, as well as the swedish one so why should I even bother the slightest about urs.
Facts are that you had no chance what so ever to beat us on the server so you had to try another way, congrats. 21-7
BUHAHAHHA i seriously laughed here...
How the fuck can u call yourself a captain when u let some1 play under fake account in nc semifinals ?
which support youre talking about ? i recall there was only 1 guy applying for swedish captain so u didn't really need any support
wow u won 21-7, confuckinggrats u clown

kOTTEN wrote:
kaparzo and illusion. Keep saying what ever you want, you can even call me a shit captain, I dont mind since I rarely play this game anymore. Besides I've received support from most of the community, as well as the swedish one so why should I even bother the slightest about urs.
Facts are that you had no chance what so ever to beat us on the server so you had to try another way, congrats. 21-7

kOTTEN wrote:
kaparzo and illusion. Keep saying what ever you want, you can even call me a shit captain, I dont mind since I rarely play this game anymore. Besides I've received support from most of the community, as well as the swedish one so why should I even bother the slightest about urs.
Facts are that you had no chance what so ever to beat us on the server so you had to try another way, congrats. 21-7

nirvana wrote:
kzk wrote:
Still it doesn't change my point, your accounts could get linked by dmw as they did to isak and your nation would be punished as well
-say hay to mocha-

They cant, because it's common knowledge they are brothers

kzk wrote:
Still it doesn't change my point, your accounts could get linked by dmw as they did to isak and your nation would be punished as well
-say hay to mocha-

kzk wrote:
Hybris wrote:
kzk wrote:
come on, dont be that hypocrit dude, me and u know that it's really hard to get your account deleted and u can't do that on your own cus clanbase doesn't delete accounts on the request

If you have an account without 1on1 pid and you leave all your clans, you don't have any pid's left and your account doesn't exist anymore. Feel free to try it out if you have such an account...
And his account didnt have 1on1 pid ? im sure it had

kzk wrote:
Hybris wrote:
kzk wrote:
come on, dont be that hypocrit dude, me and u know that it's really hard to get your account deleted and u can't do that on your own cus clanbase doesn't delete accounts on the request

If you have an account without 1on1 pid and you leave all your clans, you don't have any pid's left and your account doesn't exist anymore. Feel free to try it out if you have such an account...
And his account didnt have 1on1 pid ? im sure it had

Hybris wrote:
kzk wrote:
come on, dont be that hypocrit dude, me and u know that it's really hard to get your account deleted and u can't do that on your own cus clanbase doesn't delete accounts on the request

If you have an account without 1on1 pid and you leave all your clans, you don't have any pid's left and your account doesn't exist anymore. Feel free to try it out if you have such an account...

Hybris wrote:
kzk wrote:
come on, dont be that hypocrit dude, me and u know that it's really hard to get your account deleted and u can't do that on your own cus clanbase doesn't delete accounts on the request

If you have an account without 1on1 pid and you leave all your clans, you don't have any pid's left and your account doesn't exist anymore. Feel free to try it out if you have such an account...

kzk wrote:
come on, dont be that hypocrit dude, me and u know that it's really hard to get your account deleted and u can't do that on your own cus clanbase doesn't delete accounts on the request

kOTTEN wrote:
@scott - Keep calling us shit, it just amuses me to see how bigheaded you are, who fucking cares wether we were oc material 4 years ago? What matters is how we're playing now, and besides you can keep giving excuses for why you didnt advance. Fact is that we didnt break any rule till the semifinal whereas our only other opption wud've been to forfiet the game, you on the other hand werent even close to reaching the playoffs, actually u were quite lucky you even managed to get a draw versus us.
I'm absoluetely sure we're better then team uk eventhough we're half inactive, you just possess an ego way big to actually realize it.

Hybris wrote:
kOTTEN wrote:
I'd like you to do the same thing with snippy's account and cracker's account as you did between riseagainst and phyze
Pathetic admins, w/e.

snippy's account doesn't exist anymore. What are we supposed to say? Link someone's account to a non-existant account?

ko3ki3m0nst3r wrote:
Sorken wrote:
Poll:
Replace Hybris with an admin? (None-corrupt one)

Yes: [x]

No: [ ]

Votes: Yes, 1. No, 0

This is such a ridiculas reaction, He is just following the rules, You blame 'Hybris' cause he followed the rules? Why do you blame him only.. if there are more people involved.

Stop it man, just take how it is.. blame saik for once cause he couldnt play!! :P

ko3ki3m0nst3r wrote:
Sorken wrote:
Poll:
Replace Hybris with an admin? (None-corrupt one)

Yes: [x]

No: [ ]

Votes: Yes, 1. No, 0

This is such a ridiculas reaction, He is just following the rules, You blame 'Hybris' cause he followed the rules? Why do you blame him only.. if there are more people involved.

Stop it man, just take how it is.. blame saik for once cause he couldnt play!! :P

pumpernicklas wrote:
Ow you're comparing Shin to yourself and saying he's shit?!?

SUPERTINMAR *T* wrote:
nirvana wrote:
-mQ! BrianDJ- wrote:
nirvana wrote:
SUPERTINMAR *T* wrote:
Pathetic, almost every team played with fake accounts. At the start of this season almost everyone said they would create them to have the most competitive teams and fuck that stupid 3 player rule. But now people still manage to link a fake player via dmw once they got owned, so sad we had another 1/0 cup. No need to start the next NC with that rule, whenever people will have the ability to lame, they will.

UK didn't, and why would UK play versus SWE when we didn't play versus NL ;o

i hope u dont show up, as sweden deserved an award imo

Hardly, they are shit... if uk would of broke the rules, we would of deserved an award too. They are the OC 2nd leaguers of 4 years ago

Will you ever stop calling people shit for no reason while you got 2 times 1/0 for what ? not even playing the play-offs? imo sweden would rape UK, with 25/3 vs hun and 21/7 vs por, I'm not giving you more than 11 rounds.

nirvana wrote:
-mQ! BrianDJ- wrote:
nirvana wrote:
SUPERTINMAR *T* wrote:
Pathetic, almost every team played with fake accounts. At the start of this season almost everyone said they would create them to have the most competitive teams and fuck that stupid 3 player rule. But now people still manage to link a fake player via dmw once they got owned, so sad we had another 1/0 cup. No need to start the next NC with that rule, whenever people will have the ability to lame, they will.

UK didn't, and why would UK play versus SWE when we didn't play versus NL ;o

i hope u dont show up, as sweden deserved an award imo

Hardly, they are shit... if uk would of broke the rules, we would of deserved an award too. They are the OC 2nd leaguers of 4 years ago

-mQ! BrianDJ- wrote:
nirvana wrote:
SUPERTINMAR *T* wrote:
Pathetic, almost every team played with fake accounts. At the start of this season almost everyone said they would create them to have the most competitive teams and fuck that stupid 3 player rule. But now people still manage to link a fake player via dmw once they got owned, so sad we had another 1/0 cup. No need to start the next NC with that rule, whenever people will have the ability to lame, they will.

UK didn't, and why would UK play versus SWE when we didn't play versus NL ;o

i hope u dont show up, as sweden deserved an award imo

nirvana wrote:
SUPERTINMAR *T* wrote:
Pathetic, almost every team played with fake accounts. At the start of this season almost everyone said they would create them to have the most competitive teams and fuck that stupid 3 player rule. But now people still manage to link a fake player via dmw once they got owned, so sad we had another 1/0 cup. No need to start the next NC with that rule, whenever people will have the ability to lame, they will.

UK didn't, and why would UK play versus SWE when we didn't play versus NL ;o

-mQ! Crack3^- wrote:
kOTTEN wrote:
Well what could we have done, we only had 5 decent players in Sweden before the nc, (kotten, isak, timmeh, jockee, leek). Then shini came back active as our 6th, before our semifinal jockee told me he wouldnt be able to play for a couple of days so we had no choice but to bring shinigami in as our 5th. It was not untill the actuall gameday that I noticed that it would break the 3 player rule since shini had been in the 'honorary section' in mQ. So we had to choose from either forfiet the match or just let isak play with a fakeaccount. Quite funny seeing the portugeuse pros in the final, congrats nash you truely deserved it... not.

Ow and ye, another thing I find quite amusing is how corrupt these shit admins are. It's obvious that snippy is playing on cracker's account just to avoid the 3 player rule, both me and you know it, yet you're doing nothing about. I'd like you to do the same thing with snippy's account and cracker's account as you did between riseagainst and phyze
Pathetic admins, w/e.

don't take your frustration out on me, I just got back after a year or even more of inactivity, go easy on me will yah

When my bro said he cba with this game anymore I figured aw man that's shit for mq?!
so when brian begged me to play for mQ I told him: hmkay but I'm still rusty so I can't play to my full potential. But that turned out not to be such of a problem.

oh yeah. my brother said this was shit coz it's the 2nd NC ( or even more I dno, was inactive ) they lamed (forfeited) themselves to the final.

so stop these false accusations please + gl POR alltho it should have been SWE

Hybris wrote:
kOTTEN wrote:
I'd like you to do the same thing with snippy's account and cracker's account as you did between riseagainst and phyze
Pathetic admins, w/e.

snippy's account doesn't exist anymore. What are we supposed to say? Link someone's account to a non-existant account?

kOTTEN wrote:
Well what could we have done, we only had 5 decent players in Sweden before the nc, (kotten, isak, timmeh, jockee, leek). Then shini came back active as our 6th, before our semifinal jockee told me he wouldnt be able to play for a couple of days so we had no choice but to bring shinigami in as our 5th. It was not untill the actuall gameday that I noticed that it would break the 3 player rule since shini had been in the 'honorary section' in mQ. So we had to choose from either forfiet the match or just let isak play with a fakeaccount. Quite funny seeing the portugeuse pros in the final, congrats nash you truely deserved it... not.

Ow and ye, another thing I find quite amusing is how corrupt these shit admins are. It's obvious that snippy is playing on cracker's account just to avoid the 3 player rule, both me and you know it, yet you're doing nothing about. I'd like you to do the same thing with snippy's account and cracker's account as you did between riseagainst and phyze
Pathetic admins, w/e.

SUPERTINMAR *T* wrote:
Pathetic, almost every team played with fake accounts. At the start of this season almost everyone said they would create them to have the most competitive teams and fuck that stupid 3 player rule. But now people still manage to link a fake player via dmw once they got owned, so sad we had another 1/0 cup. No need to start the next NC with that rule, whenever people will have the ability to lame, they will.

Phyze wrote:
we did it only because jockee couldn't make it to the game and couldn't be arsed to no-show. Plus we wanted to show that we can play other maps besides renan.

GG anyway PT was ez, only aquiles was quality.

I'll do the Scott style and say "we'll probably not show up in the next war".

About solero scott, he have never played a match with us and he will probably not do it neither, he is there to avoid no-shows in the EuroCup since the normal players don't care that much anylonger.

And nashy, cmon relax it's a game, we broke the rules and don't care if we go through or not - all that matters to me is that I beat you when im playing cod4 several hours every day ;p

Thanks to the swedish team also this season, great leadership by kotten and nice players timmeh,jocke,leek. We did a good job. Och så bajsade vi på dem så jävla hårt

http://vet.hut.nu/?id=15

And the last, lucky for NL that PT made it instead of us ;P

Sorken wrote:
Poll:
Replace Hybris with an admin? (None-corrupt one)

Yes: [x]

No: [ ]

Votes: Yes, 1. No, 0

Sorken wrote:
Poll:
Replace Hybris with an admin? (None-corrupt one)

Yes: [x]

No: [ ]

Votes: Yes, 1. No, 0

nash wrote:
I deserve it way more than you do cos I followed the rules.

kOTTEN wrote:
@Hybris - Okey, I see. Well facts are that we had no other choice but to let isak use his fakeaccount since we simply dont have a community as big as the other countires.

@Devil - You dont even deserve to be in the playoffs so why even bother replying. Especially considering you were playing with fakeaccounts from the start, lowrider and larion. Too bad it still resulted in 0 wins, lawl.

@mariana - No I wouldnt call that owned, though something I would called owned is 21-7 and cheataccusing us after a NC semifinal.

nirvana wrote:
marta wrote:
Lo0oL cheeky

Owned u cunts

kOTTEN wrote:
I'd like you to do the same thing with snippy's account and cracker's account as you did between riseagainst and phyze
Pathetic admins, w/e.

marta wrote:
Lo0oL cheeky