The only thing I wonder is what kind of unrealistic, awkward killstreaks they added this time...
Maybe a portable tank? or a swarm of choppers?
Or maybe we'll get squished by a giant Treyarch logo?
KAIZERRR ヅ wrote:
OMFGNinja! wrote:
You have a point. Call of Duty isn't the competative game it once was anymore.
I have my own theory about why they disappoint us every time though.
If you look at how "quick" CoD games are release, you can assume they dont have much time to work on them and produce a game we love. I think you can pretty much say every year is a new CoD game. And when I look at the games that I LOVE: Battlefield 3 / Guild Wars 2 etc...they took YEARS to create. Especially Guild Wars 2 which has been in development for i believe at least 4 years now. Activision likes to rush through their CoD series, because every release makes them earn another batch of millions of dollaz. But the result is that we get games that weren't properly thought through.
True story. But let's be honest, why would they change their way of developing games in a very short period of time if every new CoD released breaks sales records around the world? => Millions of profit ...
Activision :
- Make new CoD's steam'less
- Make a decent compo mod BEFORE releasing the game, so competative gamers can emmediately start with compo's.
= Even higher salenumbers
I think this covers it all no +1
And btw .. robot battles and horses??
OMFGNinja! wrote:
You have a point. Call of Duty isn't the competative game it once was anymore.
I have my own theory about why they disappoint us every time though.
If you look at how "quick" CoD games are release, you can assume they dont have much time to work on them and produce a game we love. I think you can pretty much say every year is a new CoD game. And when I look at the games that I LOVE: Battlefield 3 / Guild Wars 2 etc...they took YEARS to create. Especially Guild Wars 2 which has been in development for i believe at least 4 years now. Activision likes to rush through their CoD series, because every release makes them earn another batch of millions of dollaz. But the result is that we get games that weren't properly thought through.
True story. But let's be honest, why would they change their way of developing games in a very short period of time if every new CoD released breaks sales records around the world? => Millions of profit ...
Activision :
- Make new CoD's steam'less
- Make a decent compo mod BEFORE releasing the game, so competative gamers can emmediately start with compo's.
OMFGNinja! wrote:
You have a point. Call of Duty isn't the competative game it once was anymore.
I have my own theory about why they disappoint us every time though.
If you look at how "quick" CoD games are release, you can assume they dont have much time to work on them and produce a game we love. I think you can pretty much say every year is a new CoD game. And when I look at the games that I LOVE: Battlefield 3 / Guild Wars 2 etc...they took YEARS to create. Especially Guild Wars 2 which has been in development for i believe at least 4 years now. Activision likes to rush through their CoD series, because every release makes them earn another batch of millions of dollaz. But the result is that we get games that weren't properly thought through.
In my opinion CoD went to hell after CoD4.
It's a fact, CoD series are, today, ruined (I mean, for a competitive gaming mode), only for 100% public server users it's "fine".. God, how I miss CoD1 ;(
KAIZERRR ヅ wrote:
Unfortunately, they are focussing their arrows on the console -and public players like Ninja said.
Competition wise, the CoD's (since CoD MW2) became shit. Should be alot better if they'd stop running their games along steam and just do it the old way, so decent mods can be arranged.
However, even though we don't like this game as competative gamers, it stays nice (graphicwise) and it will break salesrecords once again.
After all, that's where it's all about, selling as much as they can and make millions and millions of profit.
We can't blame them for that.
You have a point. Call of Duty isn't the competative game it once was anymore.
I have my own theory about why they disappoint us every time though.
If you look at how "quick" CoD games are release, you can assume they dont have much time to work on them and produce a game we love. I think you can pretty much say every year is a new CoD game. And when I look at the games that I LOVE: Battlefield 3 / Guild Wars 2 etc...they took YEARS to create. Especially Guild Wars 2 which has been in development for i believe at least 4 years now. Activision likes to rush through their CoD series, because every release makes them earn another batch of millions of dollaz. But the result is that we get games that weren't properly thought through.
Unfortunately, they are focussing their arrows on the console -and public players like Ninja said.
Competition wise, the CoD's (since CoD MW2) became shit. Should be alot better if they'd stop running their games along steam and just do it the old way, so decent mods can be arranged.
However, even though we don't like this game as competative gamers, it stays nice (graphicwise) and it will break salesrecords once again.
After all, that's where it's all about, selling as much as they can and make millions and millions of profit.
We can't blame them for that.
OMFGNinja! wrote:
Video or not, I know it's another game they're releasing to show us how disappointing the CoD series are these days.
I'm not gonna buy it anyway.
EuroCup XXVII
) 5 May 2012 05:49
(ClanBase Crew) 1 May 2012 13:35
Login
+1